ARC3-Survey-Report

18 2025 ARC3 SURVEY FINDINGS -6% -16% -6% -8% -6% -12% -8% -11% -4% -8% -15% -14% -11% -19% -8% -15% -68% -68% -63% -62% -76% -75% 77% 67% 82% 80% 79% 71% 75% 72% 77% 71% 70% 69% 67% 63% 71% 66% 15% 13% 14% 16% 9% 11% % Unlikely / Very unlikely % Likely / Very likely Peer Norms When comparing 2022 and 2025 data, student perceptions of peer attitudes around sexual and dating violence have remained largely consistent. In both years, most participants reported that their friends would disapprove or strongly disapprove of behaviors such as using alcohol or drugs to obtain sex, lying for sexual purposes, or using physical force in a dating context. One area showing little change and continued ambiguity is peer approval of telling stories about sexual experiences. In both years, responses were mixed. The lack of clarity likely stems from the question wording, which did not specify whether these were positive, consensual experiences or negative, harmful ones. Therefore, a need for continued education on respectful communication about sexual experiences and boundaries. Perceptions of Campus Climate Questions about anticipated response at Northern to an instance of sexual misconduct The following statements describe how Northern might handle it if a student reported an incident of sexual misconduct. Please indicate the likelihood of each statement: The institution would take the report seriously. The institution would maintain the privacy of the person making the report. The institution would do its best to honor the request of the person about how to go forward with the case. The institution would take steps to protect the safety of the person making the report. The institution would support the person making the report. The institution would provide accommodations to support the person (e.g., academic, housing, safety). The institution would take action to address factors that may have led to the sexual misconduct. The institution would handle the report fairly. The institution would label the person making the report a troublemaker. The institution would have a hard time supporting the person who made the report. The institution would punish the person who made the report. 2025 2022 2025 2022 2025 2022 2025 2022 2025 2022 2025 2022 2025 2022 2025 2022 2025 2022 2025 2022 2025 2022 -6% -16% -6% -8% -6% -12% -8% -11% -4% -8% -15% -14% -11% -19% -8% -15% -68% -68% -63% -62% -76% -75% 77% 67% 82% 80% 79% 71% 75% 72% 77% 71% 70% 69% 67% 63% 71% 66% 15% 13% 14% 16% 9% 11% % Unlikely / Very unlikely % Likely / Very likely

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MzIwNjc3MA==